In summary, while France temporarily banned the iPhone 12 due get to radiation concerns, prompting reviews in other European countries, Apple responded with a software update to address the issue, and health authorities have not confirmed any health risks associated with the device’s radiation levels.
Dr. Joel Moskowitz, director of the Center for Family and Community Health at UC Berkeley, has extensively researched the health effects of radiofrequency radiation (RFR) emitted by cell phones and other wireless devices.
He contends that prolonged exposure to RFR, even at non-thermal levels, can lead to adverse biological effects, including an increased risk of brain tumors.
His 2009 meta-analysis of 23 studies indicated a potential link between heavy mobile phone use and tumor risk, particularly in studies with higher methodological quality and no telecommunications industry funding.
CORROBORATION: Moskowitz’s concerns have been corroborated by several studies and experts:
The International Commission on the Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Fields (ICBE-EMF), of which Moskowitz is a member, criticized a 2024 World Health Organization (WHO) review for underestimating cancer risks associated with wireless exposure. They highlighted flaws in the WHO’s assessment, emphasizing that credible scientific evidence suggests increased cancer risk from cell phone radiation. The National Toxicology Program (NTP) conducted a $30 million study that found “clear evidence” of carcinogenic activity in male rats exposed to RFR, supporting the notion that such radiation can initiate and promote cancer. In 2022, Moskowitz and other experts, including former NIEHS director Linda Birnbaum, published letters in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute challenging studies that downplayed the risks of cell phone radiation. They pointed to research indicating that RFR can be absorbed into the brain and body, leading to potential health risks.
Moskowitz also raises concerns about the influence of the telecommunications industry on research and regulatory standards. He argues that organizations like the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) have conflicts of interest and that their guidelines, which focus solely on thermal effects, fail to account for non-thermal biological impacts of RFR.
In summary, Dr. Moskowitz asserts that long-term exposure to cell phone radiation poses significant health risks, a position supported by various studies and experts in the field. He advocates for more stringent safety standards and increased public awareness regarding the potential dangers of RFR.
text from ChatGPT edited and reformat 2025-05-27 1255 PST
Products and services
https://ehtrust.org/joel-m-moskowitz-ph-d/https://bodywell.com/pages/biochip-protection
https://bodywell.com/pages/biochip-protection
ChatGPT further offered:
Yes, in 2023, France halted sales of the iPhone 12 after its National Frequency Agency (ANFR) determined that the device exceeded the European Union’s Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) limit of 4.0 watts per kilogram for limb exposure, recording 5.74 W/kg when held in hand or kept in a pocket.
Following France’s action, several other Western European countries, including Belgium, the Netherlands, Germany, and Spain, initiated reviews of the iPhone 12’s radiation levels. Belgium’s state secretary for digitalization requested an assessment from its national regulator, and authorities in the Netherlands, Germany, and Spain also began examining the issue.
Apple contested the ANFR’s findings, asserting that the iPhone 12 complies with global radiation standards based on third-party lab results. Nonetheless, the company agreed to issue a software update to address the specific testing protocol used by French regulators.
The World Health Organization has stated that, after extensive research, no adverse health effects have been established as being caused by mobile phone use.
In summary, while France temporarily banned the iPhone 12 due to radiation concerns, prompting reviews in other European countries, Apple responded with a software update to address the issue, and health authorities have not confirmed any health risks associated with the device’s radiation levels.
Key Notes:
Cell Phones:
Highest SAR due to proximity to body (especially head and brain). Power output is dynamic — increases when signal is weak. Can be reduced using speakerphone or wired earbuds.
Wi-Fi Routers:
Emit RF constantly unless turned off at night. Lower SAR since they’re not worn or held against the body. 5 GHz emits more data but doesn’t penetrate walls as well as 2.4 GHz.
️ Microwave Ovens:
Enclosed with Faraday shielding — minimal leakage if functioning properly. Do not emit EMF constantly, only when operating. If seal is damaged, leakage can be a concern.
☎️ Cordless Landline Phones:
The base station emits EMF constantly, even when handset is docked. SAR of the handset is lower than cell phones but still measurable. Eco-DECT versions reduce or stop transmission when idle.
EMF and SAR Measurement Tips
If you’re testing at home:
Use a Gauss meter or EMF meter for general field strength (like the Trifield TF2 or Cornet ED88T Plus). Use a RF spectrum analyzer for more advanced measurements. SAR is hard to measure at home — usually requires lab-grade equipment and tissue simulants.
✅ Risk Minimization Tips
Device
Ways to Reduce Exposure
Cell Phone
Use speakerphone, limit call time, keep in airplane mode when not needed
Router
Keep at least 6–10 feet away from sleeping/working areas; turn off at night
Microwave
Don’t press your face to the window; replace if the door is warped
Cordless Phone
Use corded landlines or Eco-DECT phones that turn off when not in use
Digi-Hound
sdjcc.net – English & Japanese
http://www.tablefortwo.org/tft_usa/
You must be logged in to post a comment.